This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: 1. analyse, evaluate and control physical, chemical, biological hazards and psychosocial factors present in the occupational environment 2. apply legislation and standards to the management of construction, hazardous substances and physical hazards. 3. apply the relevant workplace health and safety management methods and strategies Your task is: Complete the following 3 parts: Part 1. Assessment 1_Part 1.docx Prepare a S309 workplace health and safety (WHS) management plan as required for construction. Part 2. Assessment 1_Part 2.docx Identify relevant national standards and Codes of Practice for construction. Part 3. Compare and contrast the factors which contribute to the effective management OHS in the construction industry with an industry of your choice. Length: 3000 words maximum. The reference list is not included in the word count. The use of tables and diagrams is encouraged. Appendices should not be included. Please see below for word lengths for each part. Extension applications must be lodged prior to the due date. Assignments submitted late without a granted extension will be penalised according to the Faculty of Health policy. Presentation: A4 format, 2.5cm left and right margin, page numbers; with a submission form at the front, indicating your full name, student number, assignment topic area, assignment title and word count.
Using CapraTek’s division structure as well as online research, analyze and create an overview of an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek. The specific pay structure and benefit structure will be further developed in Units 6 and 8, respectively. To complete this assignment, you will: ? Conduct a job analysis and job evaluation for CapraTek to ensure internal consistency. ? Analyze jobs and job classifications to understand how they work together and evaluate the impact of job classification systems on compensation. ? Conduct a strategic analysis, including internal and external considerations. ? Construct an action plan with recommendations for a market compensation survey. (You do not need to conduct a survey.) ? Develop an overview of an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system for CapraTek. ? Validate your strategy as to why it is or is not an internally consistent and externally competitive compensation system.
Word limit 1500-2000. Exculding reference. Please ensure that all work is your own, and any quotations are fully referenced with the author, date of publication and page number. In accordance with University and School of Management Policy, plagiarism will be penalised with a mark of zero, whilst poor referencing will also lead to reduced marks. As we operate an anonymous marking system, all work should be identified by your university number NOT your name. Essay writing Writing skills are particularly important for management students. Once statements are made in writing, they are much more difficult to retract or change so the meanings of sentences need to be concise and clear. It is therefore vitally important to develop your skills in this more formalised and rigorous form of communication. The following suggestions should help in preparing your essay: Planning: Before you start writing it is key to know enough about the topic to form an argument in response to the question set. Make sure you have read enough ? not just textbooks or lecture notes. Planning your essay is very important. Another key step before putting pen to paper, or finger to keyboard, is to work out a structure for your essay. Making the structure explicit will help you be clear about your overall line of argument. Equally, being clear about your line of argument will help shape your sense of structure. For these reasons IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO DECIDE THE THEME AND ARGUMENT OF YOUR ESSAY BEFORE YOU START TO WRITE. However many of you will also find it useful to try writing parts of the essay in order to work out your structure and plan your argument. Writing a structure plan does NOT mean writing a list of everything you want to include in the essay ? the ?shopping list? approach. Rather you need to think through the logical steps of the argument. What information or points do you need to make before you can argue a certain line? Have you considered the range of debates in the literature? How do YOU assess the arguments put forward in the readings? Are they convincing? Are they based upon adequate evidence? Apply this same critical approach to your own argument: have YOU used enough evidence (and in the appropriate places)? Have you used your material in a logical order? As important as convincing an examiner of your knowledge of the subject you’re your understanding of the debates, it is important to keep the idea of a READER in mind. Make the ground you are writing on as explicit as possible. Spell your approach ad sources out and don?t leave the reader having to guess what you are up to, or assume she or he has an omnipotent knowledge of all possible divergent views. Last and first, always check through that you have provided an argument in response to the question set ? you cannot be awarded marks for an essay which goes off at a tangent, even if it is to another equally interesting question! Framework: All essays follow the same basic framework: an introduction; a discussion that explicitly addresses the debates in the form of an argument; and a conclusion. This structure is better achieved if you have prepared a good outline. Introduction: starts with a statement of your understanding of the subject, its importance and its implications. This is a useful place to introduce your key terms or concepts by way of making some key distinctions or definitions. It is helpful for the reader if you provide ?signposts? as the direction of your essay. Main discussion: here you develop your argument and provide support (in the form of examples, research findings etc) for each of the main points of your argument. It will usually involve an assessment of the various competing and opposing analytical perspectives. If appropriate, do use headings to organise and highlight your line of argument ? but beware of using headings that fragment your essay. Main ideas should have their own paragraphs. Make a clear distinction between your ideas and those of the authors you draw upon ? even if your views are the same: the reader needs to see explicitly that you know what X?s argument is, and then your justification of why you agree (or disagree) with them. Sources should be identified in the body of the essay in the following way: Jones (2000); or Jones and Smith (2001: 29) ? where you make a direct quotation include the reference of the page number. Always include co-authors, not just the first named author, in your referencing. Conclusion: this reprises the main ideas and summarises your line of argument in answer to the question set.
Based on the video, Half Nelson, write up a Readiness Assessment of the main character, Daniel?s, current state of readiness to participate in rehabilitation. You must address each of the five core areas in your readiness assessment. 1.Need for Change . 2.Commitment to Change . 3.Self-Awareness . 4.Environmental Awareness . 5.Personal Closeness. . Your assessment should include where Daniel is in relation to each these areas in terms of his addictive behavior and a rationale as to why you have rated him on each core area in the way that you did. Be clear in your justification for the ratings you give in each section and be sure to apply your course materials to support your justification. In addition to the video, you should have a minimum of two other sources that support your assessment. Your assessment should be 2-4 pages double spaced, not including your title and reference pages. Use APA 6 formatting for all of your citations and for your reference page. Be sure to proof your grammar, spelling, and organization carefully.
Purpose: To critically analyse the current assumptions regarding the changing nature of work organizing and workplace relations. Learning outcome/s being assessed: 1. Critically evaluate important management concepts. 2. Apply and critique major theoretical approaches to contemporary management and organisations. 3. Demonstrate the value of management research and its implications for practice. Weighting: 30 % Word Limit: 1750 words (excluding references, cover page, etc.) Instructions: Please watch the movie ?Up in the air? and analyse the movie by considering the following theme, b. Gender issues in organisations
The essay needs to be a photographic essay that represents my vision of London, The essay needs to have pictures of the areas and to talk about those pictures, about history of that part of London and why you like it today The essay needs to talk and have pictures about: Harrods Knightsbridge (I live there) Aldgate East ( My University is there) Covent Garden (As A nice historical place where I like to hang out) Novikov Restaurant London (as my favourite restaurant) Hyde Park (I like to run and walk there) The essay needs to use a lot of METAPHORES AND CRITICAL THINKING It needs clearly to show how these areas represents London and what does these areas mean to myself and to London Grading Criteria (What constitutes a good assignment?): The vision should show sensitivity to the history, geography, culture and society of London, or some part of it. It should show awareness of past representations of the city. The best will combine detailed observation, a distinct sensibility, and consciousness of tradition. The best will also be thoughtfully made, sensibly organized, carefully edited and revised, and attractively presented.
In a written paper of 1,200-1,500 words, apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Communicable Disease Selection Choose one communicable disease from the following list: Chickenpox Tuberculosis Influenza Mononucleosis Hepatitis B HIV Epidemiology Paper Requirements Include the following in your assignment: Description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Describe the determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease. Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. (The textbook describes each element of the epidemiologic triangle). Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up). Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organization(s) contributes to resolving or reducing the impact of disease. A minimum of three references is required. Refer to ?Communicable Disease Chain? and “Chain of Infection” for assistance completing this assignment. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
In one page answer question in second provide 3 supporting paragraphs.We all know that we should save more for a better future. But we really don?t save sufficient amount. Watch the TED Talks video by Shlomo Benartzi called Save More Tomorrow at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzcw_02ZB1o. Do you agree and disagree with the presenters comments? Why? Provide support where applicable.
In one page answer question in second provide 3 supporting paragraphs .The CEO of a large private financial institution has just uncovered a problem with their compliance data. In meeting with the other senior employees, the CEO learned that the data is lacking quality. In addition the CEO estimates that Finance spends 2 man months each quarter to reconcile reporting data with an accuracy of only 75% once it is completed. The CEO is at a loss as to how to resolve the issue as data originates from multiple source systems in different business units with the interjection of periodic fixes. On top of that, IT refuses to take responsibility for the lack of data quality, blaming the business processes and lack of business accountability. In responding to this question, please address the CEO?s dilemma. How would you respond were you the CEO?
Prepare a critical analysis of a qualitative study focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, literature review, and theoretical framework. This can be one of the selected articles from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article. The completed analysis should be 1,000-1,250 words and should connect to your identified practice problem of interest. Refer to “Research Critique Part 1.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.